Atlanta—Supraglottic airways (SGAs) may work well for prone spinal procedures of short duration, according to a recent study. But others consider this a dangerous practice.
SGA use has been studied in the prone position but with limited patient numbers, varying weights and different levels of airway status. In this case, SGA use could help anesthesiologists and surgeons avoid intubation, reduce use of relaxants and minimize airway trauma. In addition, SGAs help promote stable hemodynamics and help maintain spontaneous ventilation.
“SGAs have been used in a variety of surgical procedures, yet rarely for prone cases,” said Thomas O’Connor, MD, of Kenmore Mercy Hospital, in Buffalo, N.Y. He presented his research at the 2016 annual meeting of the Society for Airway Management. “Few consider SGA use in prone cases, preferring endotracheal intubation.”
For this study, Dr. O’Connor and his colleagues collected data from 152 consecutive elective prone procedures. After induction with 3 mg/kg of propofol while supine, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was placed, and patients were turned prone with the LMA positioned downward. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and hydromorphone.
All patients fell into American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III with an average age of 57 years and a body mass index of 30 kg/m2, and an even split between men and women. The average case duration was 57 minutes.
“Daft”?
Of the procedures, 12% of patients required a minor adjustment of the LMA by turning the head to the side. This adjustment was not related to any recorded demographics, the researchers noted. About 4% of patients had secretions around the LMA shaft, and no aspirations occurred. In addition, no patients needed to be returned to the supine position for endotracheal intubation.
Indeed, Dr. O’Connor has managed about 1,200 of these cases in total, and only two patients have needed to be turned to the supine position for intubation. Nonetheless, Dr. O’Connor cited “Airway Management Roundtable: Seven Questions,” a review article from Anesthesiology News Airway Management (2016:9-24), which featured 10 experts who voiced near-unanimous disagreement with use of SGAs in prone procedures, calling it hazardous and, in the words of one participant, “daft.”
“Be selective in the use of this technique,” he warned. “I have the ability to work with one surgeon and wouldn’t do this with someone [with whom] I’m not familiar.
“I recognize that people feel this is inherently dangerous, but something has to be said for the technique,” he said. “I’m not recommending that people do this. I’m simply saying that this is what I’ve done, and it’s worked.”
—Carolyn Crist
Dr. O’Connor reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Please log in to post a comment
The LMA is a vital "rescue" device that can save lives in the event of "can't intubate, can't ventilate" crises, but it is otherwise inferior to elective endotracheal intubation. I have seen two deaths that resulted from LMA use. The first was a geriatric patient with a difficult airway, where the anesthesiologist installed an LMA after he was unable to intubate. The patient was then turned on his side for total hip replacement surgery, whereupon midway through the surgery the airway was lost and the patient died. The second patient was a healthy young fireman undergoing shoulder surgery in a "beach chair" position, where the anesthesiologist elected to use an LMA instead of general endotracheal anesthesia, and where sterile drapes concealed the patient's head. By the time the anesthesiologist realized that something was amiss, the patient was cyanotic and unresponsive to resuscitation.
Excellent comments. Only question I have is WHY was the THR NOT being done under regional? To place a LMA where it is unable to be watched is the pathway to court!
Thanks
Agree with coleman006. Over the years I have seen multiple cases of aspiration with LMA's used electively (NOT difficult or emergency airways) for non-supine cases. Clearly the LMA has its place in our toolbox for straightforward supine cases or as an airway salvage option in the difficult airway. However some of the reports being published appear to be closer to stunts rather than descriptions of techniques to improve patient safety/outcomes.